Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 116
Filter
1.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, UNISALUD, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1551673

ABSTRACT

En esta editorial, la autora aborda la problemática de las prácticas de bajo valor en la medicina contemporánea: aquellas intervenciones terapéuticas o diagnósticas carentes de respaldo científico, que aumentan la probabilidad de daños, generan desperdicio de recursos y amenazan la eficiencia del sistema de salud. En un contexto de preocupación global por el exceso médico y las consecuencias del sobreuso de intervenciones inefectivas, resalta la relevancia del concepto de prevención cuaternaria en la atención sanitaria, y señala la iniciativa internacional Choosing Wisely como una estrategia para identificar y revertir las prácticas de bajo valor, destacando la importancia del cambio cultural y la participación activade los pacientes. Finalmente, la autora presenta el lanzamiento de Choosing Wisely Argentina, una colaboración entre asociaciones científicas locales con el compromiso de transformar la práctica médica en este país, priorizando el bienestar del paciente y adoptando un enfoque integral hacia la atención sanitaria. (AU)


In this editorial, the author addresses the problem of low-value practices in contemporary medicine: those therapeutic or diagnostic interventions that lack scientific support and increase the probability of damage, generate waste of resources,and threaten the efficiency of the health system. In a context of global concern about medical excess and the consequences of the overuse of ineffective interventions, she highlights the relevance of the concept of quaternary prevention in healthcare, and points to the international Choosing Wisely initiative as a strategy to identify and reverse low-value practices, highlighting the importance of cultural change and active patient participation. Finally, the author presents the launch of Choosing Wisely Argentina, a collaboration amongst local scientific associations with the commitment to transform medical practice in this country, prioritizing patient well-being and adopting a comprehensive approach to health care. (AU)


Subject(s)
Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Low-Value Care , Organizational Objectives , Health Systems/economics , Evidence-Based Medicine , Medical Overuse , Patient Comfort , Quaternary Prevention
2.
Clin. biomed. res ; 42(4): 378-388, 2022. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1513218

ABSTRACT

A falta de medicamentos contendo bulas prevendo o tratamento de pacientes pediátricos representa um problema frequentemente observado em hospitais, principalmente nos setores de unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) pediátrica e neonatais. Sabe-se que, para que um tratamento seja considerado seguro e eficaz, uma série de estudos clínicos são necessários, no entanto, relata-se um baixo número dessas pesquisas envolvendo crianças, principalmente devido a questões éticas que dificultam a condução das mesmas. Assim, poucos são os medicamentos que provam ser adequados para o tratamento desses pacientes, tornando necessário recorrer ao uso de medicamentos off-label e não licenciados. Os medicamentos são classificados como off-label quando seu uso se dá de maneira que difere de suas especificações aprovadas, por sua vez, produtos não licenciados são classificados desta forma por não possuírem aprovação para sua comercialização no país ou não possuírem comprovação de segurança e eficácia. O preparo de protocolos de estudo organizados, relato de informações aos pais e à criança de maneira clara e objetiva, aproximação entre pesquisadores e pais para o estabelecimento de uma relação de confiança e a condução das pesquisas em momentos de disponibilidade da família demonstram-se estratégias importantes para facilitar a realização dos ensaios clínicos.


The lack of medicines containing drug information leaflets considering the treatment of pediatric patients is a problem frequently observed in hospitals, especially in the pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) sectors. It is known that, for a treatment to be considered safe and effective, a series of clinical studies are necessary; however, a low number of these studies involving children are reported, mainly due to ethical issues that make conducting them difficult. Thus, few drugs prove to be suitable for treating these patients, making it necessary to resort to using off-label and unlicensed drugs. Drugs are classified as off-label when their use differs from their approved specifications, in turn, unlicensed products are classified in this way due to not having approval for marketing in the country or do not have proof of safety and efficacy. Preparation of organized study protocols, reporting information to parents and the child in a clear and objective way, bringing researchers and parents closer to establish a relationship of trust and conducting research at moments when the family is available are important strategies to facilitate conducting clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Pediatrics/standards , Off-Label Use/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosage , Drug Utilization/standards
3.
Ciênc. Saúde Colet. (Impr.) ; 25(9): 3413-3419, Mar. 2020.
Article in English | LILACS, ColecionaSUS, SES-SP | ID: biblio-1133142

ABSTRACT

Abstract When Covid-19 emerged in December last year, there was no vaccine nor was there specific effective treatment for this fast-spreading and life-threatening viral respiratory infection. Clinical trials were planned and are in progress to investigate whether drugs used for influenza, HIV and other viruses, and also anthelmintics (ivermectin, nitazoxanide, niclosamide), and antimalarials (chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine) showing antiviral activity in in vitro assays, are effective and safe for Covid-19. So far there is no convincing evidence that these antiviral and antiparasitic drugs are of any benefit for Covid-19. Notwithsanding the absence of evidence of clinical efficacy, these drugs are widely used outside of clinical trials (off label) for prophylaxis and treatment of this viral infection. The rationale behind the prescription of macrolide antibiotics (azithromycin) for Covid-19 is obscure as well. The widespread prescription and use of drugs of unproven efficacy and safety for Covid-19 is at odds with the rational use of medicines, a cornerstone principle of pharmacotherapy advanced by WHO in 1985. This irrational use of drugs is cause for concern because some of them are associated with serious heart disorders and deaths.


Resumo Quando a Covid-19 surgiu em dezembro do ano passado, não havia vacina nem tratamento eficaz específico para esta infecção respiratória viral de rápida disseminação e risco de vida. Ensaios clínicos foram planejados e estão em andamento para investigar se os medicamentos usados para influenza, HIV e outros vírus e também anti-helmínticos (ivermectina, nitazoxanida, niclosamida) e antimaláricos (cloroquina, hidroxicloroquina) mostrando atividade antiviral em ensaios in vitro são eficazes e seguros para Covid-19. Até o momento, não há evidências convincentes de que esses medicamentos antivirais e antiparasitários sejam benéficos para a Covid-19. Não obstante a ausência de evidência de eficácia clínica, esses medicamentos são amplamente utilizados fora dos ensaios clínicos (off label) para profilaxia e tratamento dessa infecção viral. A lógica por trás da prescrição de antibióticos macrolídeos (azitromicina) para a Covid-19 também é obscura. A ampla prescrição e uso de medicamentos de eficácia e segurança não comprovadas para a Covid-19 está em desacordo com o uso racional de medicamentos, um princípio fundamental da farmacoterapia promovido pela OMS em 1985. Esse uso irracional de medicamentos é motivo de preocupação, porque alguns deles estão associados a graves doenças cardíacas e mortes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Off-Label Use , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Coronavirus Infections , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics
4.
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 47: e20202429, 2020. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1136545

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objectives : to identify surgeons' knowledge and compliance rate to the Safe Surgery Protocol, as well as to assess the incidence of surgery-related adverse events, including patients' knowledge about the protocol. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and prospective study. An instrument was developed to collect the socio-graphic characteristics of sixty-eight surgeons and residents, their knowledge and adherence to the safe surgery protocol. Eighty-two patients were assessed regarding their awareness about the surgical procedure. The operating environment was also evaluated. Descriptive statistics and the odds ratio are presented. Results: the surgeons, despite their previous contact with the protocol throughout the graduation period, were poorly compliant with it. Adverse events such as the use of uncalibrated equipments or the presence of foreign bodies in several equipments such as drills and cautery pens were identified. In addition, some of the adverse events were identified and fixed, after patients had already been anesthesized, but before the beginning of the surgical procedure. Patients demonstrated knowledge about the operation they would undergo, but they did not know about its duration, and they were not introduced to the surgical team. Conclusion: there were failures in the dynamics and compliance regarding some phases of the protocol, which may impact the laterality errors and patient safety.


RESUMO Objetivo: identificar o conhecimento e a taxa de adesão ao Protocolo de Cirurgia Segura pelos cirurgiões, assim como a incidência de eventos adversos relacionados à operação, além do conhecimento dos pacientes sobre o protocolo. Métodos: estudo transversal, prospectivo com caráter quantitativo. Para a coleta de dados, foi elaborado, pelos autores, um instrumento que coletou o perfil sócio gráfico de sessenta e oito cirurgiões e residentes, o conhecimento e a adesão destes ao protocolo de cirurgia segura. Oitenta e dois pacientes foram entrevistados, e o ambiente de cirurgia avaliado. Os dados foram analisados de maneira descritiva e teste Razão das Chances com Índice de Confiança (IC) de 95%. Resultados: parte dos cirurgiões demonstraram que apesar do contato com o protocolo durante o período de formação, houve deficiência à adesão, ocasionando eventos adversos como o uso de equipamentos não calibrados ou presença de corpos estranhos nos equipamentos, como brocas e canetas. Além disso, foi constatado que em pacientes já anestesiados, as falhas foram percebidas e reparadas antes do começo do procedimento. No caso dos pacientes, estes demonstraram conhecimento quanto à cirurgia que iriam realizar, porém não sabiam a duração da mesma ou tinham sido introduzidos à equipe cirúrgica. Conclusão: houve falhas na dinâmica e na adesão de algumas etapas do protocolo, prejudicando a lateralidade no processo e a segurança do paciente.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Operating Room Nursing/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety/standards , Surgeons/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Safety Management , Checklist , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged
5.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(4): 732-738, July-Aug. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1019874

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Minimally invasive urologic surgery has been developing in Brazil and now is a routine part of care in many regions and patients with different conditions benefit from it. Training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery has evolved and concerns exist both over the quality of surgical training and the practical effect on results of the urological training. This is an unprecedented study which undertook a census to determinate the current state of laparoscopic and robotic urological practice and to know the mains barriers to adequate practice in Brazil. In august 2017, surveys, consisting of an anonymous questionnaire with 15 questions, were sent via internet to the mailing list of the Brazilian Society of Urology (SBU). With these data, activities related to laparoscopy and robotic surgery of our urologists and the mains difficulties and barriers to practice laparoscopy and robotic surgery were evaluated. In our survey, 413 questionnaires were completed. Majority of the responders were currently working in the southeast region of Brazil (52.1%) and 75.5% of the surgeons performed laparoscopic surgery while, only 12.8%, robotic surgery. The lack of experience on the technique and the lack of equipment were the mains barriers and difficulties for not executing laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, respectively. Proper longitudinal training and access to good equipment in minimally invasive surgery are still barriers for urologists in our country.


Subject(s)
Humans , Urologic Surgical Procedures/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Laparoscopy/standards , Robotic Surgical Procedures/standards , Urologists/standards , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Urologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Urology/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , Surveys and Questionnaires , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Urologists/statistics & numerical data
7.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 147(5): 602-611, mayo 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1014269

ABSTRACT

Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) promote better quality and equity in health care and potentially they could improve patients' outcomes. However, their implementation is hindered by a number of factors including some related to health care professionals. Aim: To assess the perceptions and attitudes of primary care physicians regarding CPGs developed by the Chilean Ministry of Health in the context of the Health Sector Reform. Material and Methods: An adaptation of the survey "Knowledge, perceptions and attitudes towards Clinical Practice Guidelines" was sent to 1,264 primary care physicians in Chile and answered completely by 354. The analysis assessed the attitudes towards CPG, their use in primary care and their relationship with socio demographic features of respondents. Results: Eighty two percent of respondents reviewed the flowcharts of the guidelines, 85% consulted their online version. The classification of evidence levels and the strength of recommendations generated a high level of confidence with the guidelines in 70 and 64% of respondents. Eighty five percent considered that CPG could help to standardize clinical practice. The most relevant barrier hindering CPG use was the lack of a brief, simple and easy to access format in 63% of respondents. The three dimensions of the theory of planned behavior (attitude toward behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control) were associated with a greater frequency of guideline use. A higher age and not being Chilean were associated with a lower frequency of use. Conclusions: The identified factors associated with CPG use should be considered in future guideline design.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Primary Health Care/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Physicians, Primary Care/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health Personnel , Chile , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Guideline Adherence/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Physicians, Primary Care/statistics & numerical data
8.
Rev. Paul. Pediatr. (Ed. Port., Online) ; 37(2): 140-148, Apr.-June 2019. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1013293

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the structure and the processes of care for pregnant women/newborn infants, including the Essential Newborn Care (ENC), in maternity hospitals in Sergipe State, Brazil. Methods: A cross-sectional study carried out between June 2015 and April 2016 in all maternity hospitals of Sergipe with more than 500 deliveries/year (n=11). A questionnaire on the existing structure and work processes was administered to the managers. Subsequently, a representative number of postpartum women from these hospitals were interviewed (n=768). Their medical records, as well as newborn infants' records, were also analyzed. Results: Sergipe has 78 beds of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and 90 beds of Intermediate Care Unit (IMCU) to meet spontaneous and programmed demand. Only six maternity hospitals (54.5%) performed the risk classification, and four (36.3%) had protocols for high-risk parturient care. Regarding the ENC components, only 41% (n=315) of the women had early skin-to-skin contact with their babies, 33.1% (n=254) breastfed in the first hour of life, and 18% (n=138) had a companion always during birth. Conclusions: The distribution of NICU beds between capital city and other cities of the State is adequate, considering Brazilian guidelines. However, there was a low adherence to the protocols for hypertensive and hemorrhagic emergencies, and a low coverage of humanization policies, pregnancy risk classification and ENC practices, especially breastfeeding in the first hour of life, and companion always during birth.


RESUMO Objetivo: Descrever a estrutura e os processos de atendimento a gestante/recém-nascido, incluindo os componentes do Essential Newborn Care (ENC), das maternidades de Sergipe, Brasil. Métodos: Estudo transversal realizado entre junho de 2015 e abril de 2016 em todas as maternidades de Sergipe (n=11) com mais de 500 partos/ano. Foi aplicado um questionário aos gestores sobre a estrutura e os processos de trabalhos existentes. Posteriormente, um número representativo de puérperas desses hospitais foi entrevistado (n=768) e seus prontuários, bem como o dos recém-nascidos, foram analisados. Resultados: Sergipe conta com 78 leitos de Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal (UTIN) e 90 de Unidade Intermediária (UI) para atendimento da demanda espontânea e programada. Somente seis maternidades (54,5%) realizam a classificação de risco e quatro (36,3%) possuem protocolos para atendimento das parturientes de alto risco. No que se refere aos componentes do ENC, apenas 41% (n=315) das mulheres tiveram contato pele a pele precoce com seu filho, 33,1% (n=254) amamentaram na primeira hora de vida e 18% (n=138) tiveram a presença do acompanhante em todos os momentos do parto. Conclusões: A distribuição de leitos de UTIN entre capital/interior é adequada no Estado, levando-se em consideração a legislação vigente no país. Entretanto, houve baixa adesão aos protocolos das emergências hipertensivas e hemorrágicas, e baixa cobertura das políticas de humanização, da classificação de risco para a gestante e das práticas do ENC, principalmente quanto à amamentação na primeira hora de vida e à presença do acompanhante na parturição.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Adult , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Clinical Protocols , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Management/methods , Patient Care Management/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pregnancy, High-Risk , Perinatal Care/methods , Perinatal Care/organization & administration , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospitals, Maternity/standards , Hospitals, Maternity/statistics & numerical data
9.
Rev. bras. enferm ; 72(2): 354-359, Mar.-Apr. 2019.
Article in English | BDENF, LILACS | ID: biblio-1003448

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: To understand the repercussions of the nurse's clinical practice on Primary Health Care. Method: Qualitative research with the theoretical and methodological contribution of Grounded Theory. Data collection took place between May and October 2016 in Florianópolis' Primary Care service. The theoretical sample was comprised of 18 nurses divided into two groups. Results: nurses' clinical practice has repercussions on the consolidation of the trust bond between individuals, families and communities, by amplifying the problem-solving efficacy of the Primary Health Care professional's clinical practice. This is due to the implementation of clinical nursing protocols, and also the use of the International Classification for Nursing Practice. Final considerations: Nurses' clinical practice has positive repercussions on the health of Primary Health Care users.


RESUMEN Objetivo: Identificar cómo la práctica clínica del enfermero influye en la asistencia a los usuarios de la Atención Primaria a la Salud. Método: Investigación cualitativa, utilizándose como marco teórico-metodológico la Teoría Fundamentada en los Datos. La recolección de datos ocurrió entre mayo y octubre de 2016, en el servicio de Atención Primaria de Florianópolis, Brasil. El muestreo teórico comprendió a 18 enfermeros, siendo que fueron divididos en dos grupos. Resultados: La práctica clínica del enfermero influye en la consolidación del vínculo de confianza con los individuos, la familia y la comunidad por medio de la ampliación de resolutividad de la práctica clínica del profesional en la Atención Primaria a la Salud por la implementación de los protocolos clínicos de enfermería y por el uso de la Clasificación Internacional para la Práctica de Enfermería, en este escenario, y sus contribuciones a una práctica clínica efectiva y de calidad. Consideraciones Finales: La práctica clínica del enfermero influye positivamente en la asistencia a los usuarios de la Atención Primaria a la Salud.


RESUMO Objetivo: Compreender como a prática clínica do enfermeiro repercute no cuidado aos usuários na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Método: Pesquisa qualitativa com aporte teórico metodológico da Teoria Fundamentada nos Dados. A coleta de dados ocorreu entre maio e outubro de 2016 no serviço de Atenção Primária de Florianópolis. A amostragem teórica compreendeu 18 enfermeiros divididos em dois grupos. Resultados: A prática clínica do enfermeiro repercute na consolidação do vínculo de confiança com os indivíduos, família e comunidade através da ampliação da resolutividade da prática clínica do profissional na Atenção Primária à Saúde pela implementação dos protocolos clínicos de enfermagem e, também, do uso da Classificação Internacional para a Prática de Enfermagem nesse cenário e suas contribuições para uma prática clínica efetiva e de qualidade. Considerações finais: A prática clínica do enfermeiro repercute de maneira positiva no cuidado à saúde dos usuários na Atenção Primária à Saúde.


Subject(s)
Humans , Primary Health Care/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Primary Health Care/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Clinical Competence/standards , Nurse's Role/psychology , Qualitative Research , Evidence-Based Nursing , Grounded Theory , Standardized Nursing Terminology
10.
Gac. méd. Méx ; 155(2): 202-203, mar.-abr. 2019.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1286485

ABSTRACT

Resumen Los médicos requieren flexibilidad para sus prescripciones. Sin embargo, algunos límites están marcados tanto por el conocimiento vigente como por las restricciones de acceso, normas y reglamentos. El Comité de Ética y Transparencia en la Relación Médico-Industria (CETREMI) propone varias sugerencias para ayudar a los pacientes, que incluyen la selección de las mejores alternativas para cada caso, la protocolización de variaciones a los estándares de prescripción (dosis, indicaciones, etcétera) por escrito en el expediente y eludir modas, novedades no probadas, argumentos simplemente publicitarios o promocionales y conflictos de interés.


Abstract Doctors require flexibility for prescription. However, some limits are laid down both by current knowledge and by restrictions imposed by access and rules and regulations. The Committee for Ethics and Transparency in the Physician-Industry Relationship (CETREMI) of the National Academy of Medicine proposes several suggestions to help patients, which include the selection of the best alternatives for each case, formalization of prescription standards variations (doses, drug indications, etc.) written down in the medical records, and avoidance of fashions, untested novelties, argumentations solely based on advertising or commercial promotion and conflicts of interest.


Subject(s)
Humans , Physicians/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Ethics, Medical , Physicians/ethics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/ethics , Advisory Committees , Mexico
11.
Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet ; 41(2): 97-101, Feb. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1003529

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective To analyze the prescription of antimicrobial agents for pregnant women admitted into the obstetrics service who presented with acute pyelonephritis. Methods Three cross-sectional studies were performed comparing the prescription of antimicrobials for pyelonephritis in pregnant women in the time periods evaluated (2010-2011: 99 patients evaluated; 2013: 116 patients evaluated; 2015: 107 patients evaluated), at the Hospital Fêmina, Porto Alegre, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The analysis was performed before and after the promotion of an institutional protocol for the treatment of pyelonephritis during pregnancy, and on a third occasion after the introduction of a smartphone-based mobile educational tool. Results The evaluation of the prescribing physicians and the adequacy of the prescriptions between the different periods studied revealed a significant increase in appropriate conduct for the choice of antimicrobial (2010: 83.8%; 2013: 95.7%; and 2015: 100%), route of administration (2010: 97%; 2013: 100%; and 2015: 100%), and interval (2010: 91.9%; 2013: 95.7%; and 2015: 100%), following the introduction of the protocol, and again after the implementation of the softwareapplicationwithorientationsontheantimicrobial treatment. Conclusion The use of specific mobile applications should be encouraged to attain a better quality and accuracy in prescriptions and to include strategies that not only reduce the risk of negative outcomes, but also improve the quality of care and treatment for maintaining the health both of the mother and of the baby.


Resumo Objetivo Analisar a prescrição de antimicrobianos para gestantes admitidas no serviço de obstetrícia que apresentaram pielonefrite aguda. Métodos Foram realizados três estudos transversais comparando a prescrição de antimicrobianos para pielonefrite em gestantes nos períodos avaliados (2010-2011: 99 indivíduos avaliados; 2013: 116 indivíduos avaliados; 2015: 107 indivíduos avaliados), no Hospital Fêmina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. A análise foi realizada antes e após a promoção de um protocolo institucional para o tratamento da pielonefrite durante a gravidez e, em uma terceira ocasião, após a introdução de uma ferramenta educacional móvel para uso por smartphone. Resultados A avaliação das prescrições médicas e a adequação das prescrições entre os diferentes períodos estudados revelaram um aumento significativo na conduta adequada para a escolha do antimicrobiano (2010: 83,8%; 2013: 95,7%; e 2015: 100%), via de administração (2010: 97%; 2013: 100%; e 2015: 100%) e intervalo (2010: 91,9%; 2013: 95,7%; e 2015: 100%), após a introdução do protocolo, e novamente após a implementação do aplicativo com orientações sobre tratamento antimicrobiano. Conclusão O uso de aplicativos móveis específicos deve ser incentivado para obter melhor qualidade e precisão nas prescrições e incluir estratégias que não apenas reduzam o risco de resultados negativos, mas que também melhorem a qualidade dos cuidados e do tratamento para manter a saúde conjunta da mãe e do bebê.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Pyelonephritis/drug therapy , Mobile Applications , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Obstetrics/education , Drug Prescriptions/standards , Quality of Health Care , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Brazil , Clinical Protocols , Acute Disease , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Cell Phone , Education, Medical/methods , Hospitalization
12.
Rev. bras. epidemiol ; 22(supl.3): e190014.supl.3, 2019. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1057807

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Introdução: O aplicativo para smartphone AtestaDO foi desenvolvido para auxiliar o médico na certificação da causa de morte. Neste estudo se propõe avaliar a aceitabilidade desse aplicativo. Métodos: Médicos foram convidados para participar de reuniões sobre certificação correta da causa da morte e avaliar o aplicativo em três etapas dessas reuniões, realizadas em Natal e em dois grandes hospitais de Belo Horizonte. Resultados: Em Natal, 82% dos 38 médicos participantes tinham mais de 20 anos de graduação, e em Belo Horizonte, mais de 67% dos 58 médicos tinham menos de 5 anos de graduação. As seções "Interface do aplicativo", "Como atestar as causas de morte", "Prática com exercícios" e "Outras informações para o médico" foram bem avaliadas por mais de 50% dos médicos de Belo Horizonte. Em Natal, todas as seções foram bem avaliadas por pelo menos 80% dos médicos. Mais de 70% dos participantes de Natal e da segunda etapa de Belo Horizonte usariam o aplicativo para preencher a causa de morte. A probabilidade de usar o AtestaDO para dar aulas sobre preenchimento da Declaração de Óbito foi de 83% para médicos de Natal, mas inferior a 60% em Belo Horizonte. Nas três etapas, a maioria dos médicos recomendaria o uso do aplicativo para outros colegas. Conclusão: A avaliação do aplicativo AtestaDO mostrou boa aceitabilidade. Espera-se que o uso dessa ferramenta permita alcançar melhorias na certificação médica da causa do óbito.


ABSTRACT Introduction: A smartphone application named AtestaDO was developed to support physicians with medical certification of the cause of death. The objective of this study is to evaluate the acceptability of the app. Methods: Physicians were invited to attend meetings on the proper certification of cause of death, and to evaluate the application in a national workshop in Natal (first stage) and in two large hospitals in Belo Horizonte (second and third stages). Results: In Natal, 82% of 38 physicians had more than 20 years of experience and in Belo Horizonte, more than 67% of 58 physicians had less than 5 years of experience. The sections "Application interface", "How to certify the causes of death", "Practice with exercises" and "Other information for physicians" were positively evaluated by more than 50% of physicians in Belo Horizonte. In Natal, all sections were positively evaluated by at least 80% of participants. More than 70% of the participants in both Natal and the second stage of Belo Horizonte indicated they would possibly use AtestaDO to guide filling of a death certificate. The probability of using AtestaDO to teach classes on filling death certificates was 83.3% for Natal's physicians but less than 60% in Belo Horizonte. In the three stages, most physicians would recommend using the application to other colleagues. Conclusion: The evaluation of AtestaDO showed good acceptability. We expect that the use of this tool enables improvements in medical certification of causes of death.


Subject(s)
Humans , Physicians/standards , Software/standards , Death Certificates , Cause of Death , Smartphone/standards , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Brazil , Surveys and Questionnaires , Reproducibility of Results , Quality Improvement
13.
Rev. chil. pediatr ; 90(1): 44-51, 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-990885

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: La anafilaxia es una emergencia. De acuerdo con las últimas recomendaciones internacionales el reconocimiento de los criterios clínicos y el tratamiento temprano con adrenalina intramuscular se asocian a mayor sobrevida. OBJETIVO: Determinar el conocimiento de los médicos pediatras de un Hospital Pediátrico de tercer nivel sobre los criterios diagnósticos y el tratamiento de la anafilaxia. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo transversal que considera diseño, aplicación y validación de una encuesta anónima a médicos con residencia completa en pediatría que realizan guardias en un hospital de tercer nivel. Los ítems de la Encuesta comprendieron tres dimensiones, experiencia del operador (2 ítems), manejo farmacológico (3 ítems) e identificación del cuadro (4 ítems). El análisis estadístico utilizó el programa SPSS v.21, presentando medidas de tendencia central (mediana, rango y tabla de frecuencias) y para su comparación prueba de Chi cuadrado. Se consideró significativo un valor de p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Se encuestaron 71 médicos con una mediana de 3 años transcurridos desde el fin de la residencia. 35% identificó todos los criterios clínicos; 99% (70) indicó adrenalina, 73% por vía intramuscular y 55% a dosis correcta (solo el 48% contestó la dosis y vía correctamente). En forma global la adecuación para identificación más manejo correcto fue del 21%. Los médicos con menos de 5 años de experiencia tuvieron mejor desempeño en la administración de adrenalina intramuscular (83% vs 52% p = 0,005) y en la detección de síntomas gastrointestinales (60%vs35% p = 0,043). CONCLUSIONES: Existen dificultades para la identificación y el manejo apropiado de la anafilaxia por pediatras de un Hospital de tercer nivel en un escenario teórico. Aunque la mayoría eligió la adrenalina como droga de primera línea, la mitad no la indicó de forma correcta y solo un tercio reconoció el cuadro en todos sus escenarios.


INTRODUCTION: Anaphylaxis is an emergency condition. According to the latest international guide lines, early recognition and treatment with intramuscular epinephrine are associated with increased survival. OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of knowledge of pediatricians in a tertiary Pediatric Hos pital about the diagnostic criteria and treatment of anaphylaxis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A cross-sec tional descriptive study was conducted, designing, applying, and validating an anonymous survey to physicians with complete residency in pediatrics who are on call at a third level hospital. The statisti cal analysis was made using the SPSS v.21 software, presenting measures of central tendency (median, range, and frequency table) and Chi-square test for comparison. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 71 physicians completed the survey with a median of three years after the end of residency.35% of them identified all clinical criteria, 99% (70) indicated epinephrine, 73% chose the intramuscular route, and 55% indicated the correct dose. Only 48% of responders chose the dose and administration route correctly. In general, 21% recognized anaphylaxis and used epinephrine correctly. Physicians with less than five years of experience performed better in the intramuscular administration of epinephrine (83% vs 52% p = 0.005) and in the detection of gastrointestinal symp toms (60% vs 35% p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: There are difficulties in the identification and proper management of anaphylaxis by pediatricians of a tertiary Pediatric Hospital in a theoretical clinical setting. Although most of pediatricians chose epinephrine as a first-line drug, half of them did not indicate it correctly, and only one-third recognized anaphylaxis in all scenarios.


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Sympathomimetics/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Argentina , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Health Care Surveys , Emergencies , Pediatricians/standards , Pediatricians/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Pediatric , Injections, Intramuscular
14.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(3): 512-523, May-June 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-954054

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: Although the worldwide percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) practice pat- terns determined via a survey sent to members of the Endourological Society have been published, differences in PCNL practice patterns among Latin American urologists based on endourological or lithiasis training have not been published. To determine the PCNL practice patterns among Latin American urologists with and without training in endourology. Materials and Methods: The SurveyMonkey® web platform was used to develop a 27-item survey on PCNL for the treatment of renal stones, and the survey was sent via e- -mail and other electronic media to 2000 urologists from 15 Latin American countries. Endourology-trained (group 1) and nontrained urologists (group 2) were analyzed. The group results were compared using the chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. SPSS version 20 for Windows was used for all analyses. Results: A total of 331 urologists responded to the survey (rate of 16.55%): 221 (66.7%) in group 1 and 110 (33.2%) in group 2). In groups 1 and 2, 91.9% and 63.2% performed PCNL, respectively: 85.1% and 58.5% used preoperative tomography, respectively; 12.7% and 4.7% used preoperative nephrolitometry nomograms, respectively: 45.2% and 32.1% used endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery, respectively: 68.3% and 38.7% used mul- tiple percutaneous tract realization, respectively: and 19.9% and 5.7% used minimally invasive PCNL, respectively (all p=0.0005). Conclusions: Statistically significant differences were observed in PCNL practice patterns of Latin American urologists with and without training in endourology. Specific training in endourology significantly influence the practice patterns of Latin American urologists.


Subject(s)
Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Urologists/education , Urologists/standards , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/education , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/standards , Urology/education , Urology/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urologists/statistics & numerical data , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/methods , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/statistics & numerical data , Latin America , Middle Aged
15.
Clinics ; 73: e347, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-890743

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Physicians do not adequately use their unique professional privilege to prevent patients from smoking. The aim of this study was to investigate the type and extent of advice given to patients by physicians of different medical specialties regarding smoking cessation. METHODS: In total, 317 volunteer physicians were included in this study. The participants rated their attitudes toward the smoking habits of their patients by completing a questionnaire. The approaches used to address the smoking habits of patients significantly differed among physicians working at polyclinics, clinics and emergency service departments (p<0.001). Physicians working at clinics exhibited the highest frequency of inquiring about the smoking habits of their patients, while physicians working at emergency service departments exhibited the lowest frequency. RESULTS: Physicians from different medical specialties significantly differed in their responses. Physicians specializing in lung diseases, thoracic surgery, and cardiology were more committed to preventing their patients from cigarette smoking. CONCLUSIONS: The role of physicians, particularly pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons, is critical in the fight against cigarette smoking. Promoting physician awareness of this subject is highly important in all other branches of medicine.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Physician's Role/psychology , Specialization , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Cigarette Smoking/adverse effects , Attitude of Health Personnel , Choice Behavior , Surveys and Questionnaires , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data
16.
Ciênc. Saúde Colet. (Impr.) ; 22(8): 2571-2580, Ago. 2017. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-890417

ABSTRACT

Resumo O uso racional de medicamentos (URM) é considerado um dos elementos-chave recomendados pela Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS) para as políticas de medicamentos. O crescimento excessivo no uso de medicamentos em muitos países tem sido apontado como uma importante barreira para o alcance do URM e faz parte de um fenômeno denominado ´farmaceuticalização´ da sociedade. Desta forma, o presente artigo objetiva apresentar movimentos para racionalizar o uso do metilfenidato no Brasil e discutir os limites impostos tendo como referência o conceito de farmaceuticalização da sociedade. Trata-se de estudo exploratório, realizado por meio de narrativa da literatura científica. As controvérsias acerca dos usos do metilfenidato o torna um bom exemplo deste fenômeno podendo auxiliar na reflexão e na construção de novos caminhos para os limites encontrados pelo conceito de uso racional de medicamentos.


Abstract The rational use of medicines (URM) is considered one of the key elements recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for pharmaceutical policies. The excessive increase in the use of medicines in many countries has been identified as a major barrier to the achievement of URM and is part of a phenomenon called the 'pharmaceuticalization' of the society. This paper aims to present innitiatives to rationalize the use of methylphenidate and its limits in Brazil, considering the concept of pharmaceuticalization of the society. It is an exploratory study, based on a narrative review of the scientific literature. Controversies about the uses of methylphenidate make it a good example of this phenomenon and may help in the reflection and construction of new paths to the limits found by the concept of rational use of medicines.


Subject(s)
Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Drug and Narcotic Control , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , World Health Organization , Brazil
17.
Ciênc. Saúde Colet. (Impr.) ; 22(1): 235-244, jan. 2017. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-839900

ABSTRACT

Resumo O objetivo deste artigo é descrever o processo da inserção do farmacêutico na equipe de uma Unidade Básica de Saúde e os resultados na promoção do acesso e uso racional de medicamentos. Trata-se de estudo descritivo, transversal, realizado em unidade de atenção primária do município de São Paulo. As atividades do farmacêutico foram avaliadas em relação à estruturação e organização do serviço, melhoria do padrão de prescrição médica, elaboração de método de orientação e implantação de serviços farmacêuticos clínicos. A análise estatística foi realizada empregando o teste Qui-Quadrado de Pearson, com nível de significância de 5%, e o ODDs Ratio, quando comparados os períodos anterior e posterior à intervenções e resultados entre os anos de 2010 e 2011. A atuação do farmacêutico apresentou resultados estatisticamente significativos na redução da falta de medicamentos; melhora da qualidade da prescrição (com aumento do número de prescrições atendidas); redução do número de medicamentos prescritos entre os pacientes em seguimento farmacoterapêutico; e, comparando-se os anos 2010 e 2011, as recomendações de mudanças na farmacoterapia passaram a ter maior nível de aceitação. O farmacêutico contribuiu efetivamente para o acesso e a promoção do uso racional de medicamentos.


Abstract Objective: to describe the pharmaceutical inclusion process in a Basic Health Unit multidisciplinary team and evaluate results related to rational use and promotion of access to essential medicines. Methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted in a primary care health unit in the city of São Paulo. Pharmacist's activities were evaluated regarding the service structure and organization and prescribing quality improvement, guidance method creation, and implementation of clinical pharmacy service. Data measured before and after the interventions and between 2010 and 2011 were analyzed using Pearson´s chi-square test with a significance level of 5%, and odds ratio. Results: Pharmacist's activities had statistically significant result in drug shortage reduction; prescribing quality improvement associated with an increased proportion of prescriptions met; decrease in the total of prescribed drugs among patients receiving pharmacotherapeutic follow-up and, comparing the years 2010 and 2011, changes in the pharmacotherapy recommendations have gained increased acceptance level. Conclusions: Pharmacist's activities may effectively provide rational use and promotion of access to essential medicines.


Subject(s)
Humans , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Pharmaceutical Services/organization & administration , Drugs, Essential/supply & distribution , Pharmaceutical Services/standards , Primary Health Care/standards , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Professional Role , Prescription Drugs/administration & dosage , Quality Improvement , Health Services Accessibility
18.
Clinics ; 71(7): 387-391, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-787434

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Physician compliance with standard precautions is important in the specialty of gynecology and obstetrics because of the high frequency of invasive procedures. The current study investigated compliance with standard precautions among resident physicians working in gynecology and obstetrics. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted among resident physicians in gynecology and obstetrics in their first (R1), second (R2) and third (R3) years of residency at a teaching hospital in a city in São Paulo. A structured questionnaire that included demographic and professional aspects and the Standard Precautions Adherence Scale were used to collect data. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM® SPSS version 20. Ethical aspects were considered. RESULTS: Fifty-eight resident physicians participated in the study. Of the enrolled participants, 27 (46.6%) were in R1, 12 (20.7%) were in R2 and 19 (32.8%) were in R3. The standard precautions compliance score was 4.1, which was classified as intermediate. There were no significant differences in the compliance scores of the resident physicians across the three years of residency (H=2.34, p=0.310). CONCLUSION: Compliance with standard precautions among resident physicians was intermediate. Preventive measures in clinical practice are not fully adopted in the specialty of gynecology and obstetrics. More important, many professionals claimed lack of sufficient training in standard precautions in the workplace. Such circumstances should draw the attention of hospital management with regard to occupational health risks.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Advance Directive Adherence/standards , Gynecology/education , Internship and Residency/standards , Obstetrics/education , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Advance Directive Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Guideline Adherence , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universal Precautions
19.
Gut and Liver ; : 83-94, 2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-111613

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study sought to characterize the current sedation practices of Korean endoscopists in real-world settings. METHODS: All active members of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy were invited to complete an anonymous 35-item questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 22.7% (1,332/5,860). Propofol-based sedation was the dominant method used in both elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy (55.6%) and colonoscopy (52.6%). The mean satisfaction score for propofol-based sedation was significantly higher than that for standard sedation in both examinations (all p<0.001). The use of propofol was supervised exclusively by endoscopists (98.6%). Endoscopists practicing in nonacademic settings, gastroenterologists, or endoscopists with <10 years of endoscopic practice were more likely to use propofol than were their counterparts (all p<0.001). In total, 27.3% of all respondents performed sedation practices without having undergone sedation training, and 27.4% did so without any formal sedation protocols. The choice of propofol as the dominant sedation method was the only significant predictor of endoscopist experience with serious sedation-related adverse events (odds ratio, 1.854; 95% confidence interval, 1.414 to 2.432). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopist-directed propofol administration is the predominant sedation method used in Korea. This survey strongly suggests that there is much room for quality improvement regarding sedation training and patient vigilance in endoscopist-directed sedation.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Colonoscopy/methods , Conscious Sedation/methods , Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Gastroenterology/methods , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Patient Satisfaction , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Propofol , Quality Improvement , Republic of Korea , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
Acta ortop. mex ; 29(5): 275-279, sep.-oct. 2015. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-782707

ABSTRACT

Las lesiones de la articulación tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) son producidas en accidentes automovilísticos en más de 20% de los casos, siendo poco común este tipo de trauma y su reducción ha sido reportada en 50% de los casos de manera cerrada. Un paciente masculino de 18 años de edad electricista participa en trauma de alta energía, presentando fractura luxación de Lisfranc expuesta de pie izquierdo grado III B Gustilo y Anderson, siendo sometido a lavado y desbridamiento quirúrgicos, reducción abierta y fijación interna y cobertura cutánea inmediata. Con el tratamiento estricto y los cuidados de las lesiones ortopédicas severas, la proporción de las complicaciones secundarias pueden disminuir. El tratamiento de las lesiones severas de las extremidades incluyendo las óseas combinadas con la de los tejidos blandos (piel, tejido subcutáneo, fascias, uniones músculo-tendinosas, ligamentos, periostio y estructuras neurovasculares), deben seguir un protocolo multidisciplinario: desbridamiento extenso de tejido no viable, erradicación de infecciones y reconstrucción o cobertura de tejidos. Por lo que todo cirujano ortopedista debe tener conocimiento básico del mismo, teniendo vital importancia el manejo adecuado, la técnica precisa para cada caso y el momento preciso para su solución.


More than 20% of the tarsometatarsal joint injuries (Lisfranc injuries) occur during motor vehicle accidents. This kind of trauma is infrequent and in 50% of cases closed reduction is used. A 18 year-old male patient sustained a high-energy trauma resulting in a Gustilo and Anderson III B open Lisfranc fracture dislocation of the left foot. Surgical debridement, open reduction and internal fixation, and immediate skin coverage were performed. The secondary complication rate may decrease with stringent treatment adherence and proper care of severe orthopedic injuries. Treatment of the latter, including bone and soft tissue injuries (skin, subcutaneous tissue, fascias, musculotendinous junctions, ligaments, periosteum, and neurovascular structures) should follow a multidisciplinary protocol: extensive debridement of nonviable tissue, eradication of infections, and tissue reconstruction or coverage. Thus, any orthopedic surgeon should possess basic knowledge of this protocol. Proper management, using the right technique in each case, and the right timing of treatment are of the utmost importance.


Subject(s)
Humans , Certification , Colonoscopy/standards , Medicine/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Specialization , Educational Measurement , Stress, Psychological , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL